Groß stands out as the premium midfield option with 15.5 form and 8.37 projected points, though his 5.9 price and 29.7 ownership reflect his popularity. For budget-conscious managers, Davis at 4.0 offers 5.75 projected points with minimal 7.0 ownership, while Bogle at 4.6 combines 10.0 form with 6.35 projected points at just 7.4 ownership.
Davis is the best value in the round
| Team | GW 6 | GW 7 | GW 8 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenal | LEE (H) | NFO (A) | EVE (H) |
| Aston Villa | BRE (H) | NEW (A) | MCI (H) |
| Bournemouth | CHE (A) | SUN (H) | MUN (A) |
| Brentford | AVL (A) | LIV (H) | HUL (A) |
| Brighton | SUN (A) | CRY (H) | LIV (A) |
| Chelsea | BOU (H) | EVE (A) | TOT (H) |
| Coventry City | NEW (H) | TOT (A) | FUL (H) |
| Crystal Palace | NFO (H) | BHA (A) | NEW (H) |
| Everton | HUL (A) | CHE (H) | ARS (A) |
| Fulham | IPS (A) | HUL (H) | COV (A) |
| Hull City | EVE (H) | FUL (A) | BRE (H) |
| Ipswich Town | FUL (H) | MCI (A) | NFO (H) |
| Leeds | ARS (A) | MUN (H) | SUN (A) |
| Liverpool | MCI (H) | BRE (A) | BHA (H) |
| Man City | LIV (A) | IPS (H) | AVL (A) |
| Man Utd | TOT (H) | LEE (A) | BOU (H) |
| Newcastle | COV (A) | AVL (H) | CRY (A) |
| Nott'm Forest | CRY (A) | ARS (H) | IPS (A) |
| Spurs | MUN (A) | COV (H) | CHE (A) |
| Sunderland | BHA (H) | BOU (A) | LEE (H) |
Common questions
Who is the best transfer for Gameweek 6?
Davis at Ipswich Town offers the highest points per million at 1.4, combining a low price of 4.0m with a projected return of 5.75 points against Fulham at home. Groß at Brighton provides an alternative premium option with stronger form and higher projection.
How many transfers should I make in Gameweek 6?
The number of transfers to make depends on squad needs and current form. Prioritise addressing weaknesses rather than chasing marginal gains. Each transfer should represent clear value improvement over existing players.
What does points per million mean in FPL?
Points per million measures a player's projected return relative to cost. Groß's 8.37 projected points at 5.9 price represents better value than De Cuyper's 5.54 projected points at 5.0 price, despite the lower absolute cost.